The Principles of Mathematics

The Principles of Mathematics is a book written by Bertrand Russell in 1903. In it he presented his famous paradox and argued his thesis that mathematics and logic are identical.[1]

The book presents a view of the foundations of mathematics and has become a classic reference. It reported on developments by Giuseppe Peano, Mario Pieri, Richard Dedekind, Georg Cantor, and others. In 1937 Russell prepared a new introduction saying, "Such interest as the book now possesses is historical, and consists in the fact that it represents a certain stage in the development of its subject." Further editions were printed in 1938, 1951, 1996, and 2009.

Contents

Early reviews

Reviews were prepared by G. E. Moore and Charles Sanders Peirce, but Moore's was never published[2] and that of Peirce was, as one author described it, "so brief and cursory that I am convinced that he never read the book."[3] However, a long and generally favorable review was written by G. H. Hardy and appeared in Times Literary Supplement (Issue #88, 18 September 1903). Hardy titles his review "The Philosophy of Mathematics" and expects the book to appeal more to philosophers than mathematicians. But he says

[I]n spite of its five hundred pages the book is much too short. Many chapters dealing with important questions are compressed into five or six pages, and in some places, especially in the most avowedly controversial parts, the argument is almost too condensed to follow. And the philosopher who attempts to read the book will be especially puzzled by the constant presupposition of a whole philosophical system utterly unlike any of those usually accepted.

In 1904 another review appeared in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (11(2):74–93) written by Edwin Bidwell Wilson.He says "The delicacy of the question is such that even the greatest mathematicians and philosophers of to-day have made what seem to be substantial slips of judgement and have shown on occasions an astounding ignorance of the essence of the problem which they were discussing. ... all too frequently it has been the result of a wholly unpardonable disregard of the work already accomplished by others." Wilson recounts the developments of Peano that Russell reports, and takes the occasion to correct Henri Poincaré who had ascribed them to David Hilbert. In praise of Russell, Wilson says "Surely the present work is a monument to patience, perseverance, and thoroughness."(page 88)

Later reviews

In 1959 Russell wrote My Philosophical Development in which he recalled the impetus to write the Principles:

It was at the International Congress of Philosophy in Paris in the year 1900 that I became aware of the importance of logical reform for the philosophy of mathematics. ... in every discussion [Peano] showed more precision and more logical rigor than was shown by anybody else. ... It was [Peano's works] that gave the impetus to my own views on the principles of mathematics.[4]

Recalling the book after his later work, he provides this evaluation:

The Principles of Mathematics, which I finished on May 23, 1902, turned out to be a crude and rather immature draft of the subsequent work (Principia Mathematica), from which, however, it differed in containing controversy with other philosophies of mathematics..[5]

Such self-deprecation from the author after half a century of philosophical growth is understandable. On the other hand, Jules Vuillemin wrote in 1968

The Principles inaugurated contemporary philosophy. Other works have won and lost the title. Such is not the case with this one. It is serious, and its wealth perseveres. Furthermore, in relation to it, in a deliberate fashion or not, it locates itself again today in the eyes of all those that believe that contemporary science has modified our representation of the universe and through this representation, our relation to ourselves and to others.[6]

Russel's Principles of 1903 also looms large in Ivor Grattan-Guinness' study of the roots of modern logic.

Contents

The Principles of Mathematics consists of 59 chapters divided into seven parts: indefinables in mathematics, number, quantity, order, infinity and continuity, space, matter and motion. There is an anticipation of relativity physics in the final part as the last three chapters consider Newton's laws of motion, absolute and relative motion, and Hertz's dynamics. However, Russell rejects what he calls "the relational theory", and says on page 489

For us, since absolute space and time have been admitted, there is no need to avoid absolute motion, and indeed no possibility of doing so.

In his review, Hardy (1903) says "Mr. Russell is a firm believer in absolute position in space and time, a view as much out of fashion nowadays that Chapter [58: Absolute and Relative Motion] will be read with peculiar interest."

References

  1. ^ Russell, Bertrand (1903 (1st ed), 1938 (2nd ed)). Principles of Mathematics (2nd edition). W.W. Norton. ISBN 0-393-00249-7. "The fundamental thesis of the following pages, that mathematics and logic are identical, is one which I have never since seen any reason to modify."  The quotation is from the first page of Russell's introduction to the second (1938) edition.
  2. ^ Quin, Arthur (1977). The Confidence of British Philosophers. p. 221. ISBN 90-04-05397-2. 
  3. ^ Murphy, Murray (1993). The Development of Peirce's Philosophy. Hackett Pub. Co.. p. 241. ISBN 0-87220-231-3. 
  4. ^ Russell My Philosophical Development p 65
  5. ^ Russell My Philosophical Development p 74
  6. ^ J. Vuillemin 1968 p 333

External links